Appellate Cases

Appellate Court Experience with Links to Published Opinions on Google Scholar

• London v. Snak-Time Catering, 352 N.C. 589, 544 S.E.2d 781 (2000) (wrote response to petition for writ for certiorari, but not credited in Supreme Court opinion), appeal after remand, COA 03-1093 (2003) (case settled after Record on Appeal and after writing appellant’s brief). https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=13670921099185450321&q=london+v+snak+time+catering+inc&hl=en&as_sdt=4,34.
• Shah v. Howard Johnson, 353 N.C. 381, 547 S.E.2d 17 (2001) (wrote response to Petition for Discretionary Review), on appeal from 140 N.C. App. 58, 535 S.E.2d 577 (2000). https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=14324283702688327104&q=shah+v+howard+johnson&hl=en&as_sdt=4,34
• Thomas v. Bost, COA00-237, 2001 N.C. App. LEXIS 902 (filed May 15, 2001) (wrote appellee’s brief), petition for discretionary review denied, 353 N.C. 734, 552 S.E.2d 636 (2001) (wrote Response to Petition for Discretionary Review). https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=10146718878829372403&q=Thomas+v.+bost&hl=en&as_sdt=4,34
• Groves v. Travelers Ins. Co., 354 N.C. 206, 552 S.E.2d 141 (2001) (wrote amicus curiae brief for the North Carolina Academy of Trial Lawyers). https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=54646914103931983&q=groves+v+travelers+ins+co&hl=en&as_sdt=4,34
• Bridwell v. Golden Corral Steak House, 149 N.C. App. 338, 561 S.E.2d 298 (2002), petition for discretionary review denied, 355 N.C. 747, 565 S.E.2d 193 (2002). https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=545555636595643977&q=bridwell+v+golden+corral+steak+house&hl=en&as_sdt=4,34 and https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=16930014962432399504&q=bridwell+v+golden+corral+steak+house&hl=en&as_sdt=4,34
• Ruiz v. Belk Masonry Co., 148 N.C. App. 675, 559 S.E.2d 249 (2002), petition for discretionary review denied, 356 N.C. 166, 568 S.E.2d 610 (2002). https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=3071331508436807930&q=ruiz+v+belk+masonry+co+inc&hl=en&as_sdt=4,34 and https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=8432815170850703056&q=ruiz+v+belk+masonry+co+inc&hl=en&as_sdt=4,34
• Logan v. Roger’s Concrete Co., COA 01-588, 2002 N.C. App. LEXIS 1785 (2002) (wrote appellee’s brief), petition for discretionary review denied, 356 N.C. 164, 568 S.E.2d 197 (2002) (wrote Response to Petition for Discretionary Review). https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=17038779731276598792&q=logan+v+rogers+concrete+company&hl=en&as_sdt=4,34
• Osmond v. Carolina Concrete Specialties, 151 N.C. App. 541, 568 S.E.2d 204 (2002), pet. for disc. rev. denied, 356 N.C. 676, 577 S.E.2d 631 (2003) (wrote Response to Petition for Discretionary Review). https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=426599593639641625&q=osmond+v+carolina+concrete+specialties&hl=en&as_sdt=4,34 and https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=12615554678964525154&q=osmond+v+carolina+concrete+specialties&hl=en&as_sdt=4,34
• Boney v. Winn-Dixie, Inc., 163 N.C. App. 330, 593 S.E.2d (2004). https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=6365499601145747223&q=boney+v+winn+dixie+inc&hl=en&as_sdt=4,34
• Willey v. Williamson Produce, 357 N.C. 41, 577 S.E.2d 622 (2003) (per curiam) (wrote amicus curiae brief for the North Carolina Academy of Trial Lawyers). https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=17024462906587337296&q=willey+v+williamson+produce&hl=en&as_sdt=4,34
• Starnes v. Interstate Foam & Supply, IC No. 801639 (Full Comm’n, filed June 8, 2006) (defendants’ Notice of Appeal dismissed before Record on Appeal filed).
• Atkins v. Kelly Springfield Tire Co., 358 N.C. 540, 597 S.E.2d 128 (2004) (per curiam) (wrote amicus curiae brief for the North Carolina Academy of Trial Lawyers). https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=14701009834866960558&q=Atkins+v.+springfield&hl=en&as_sdt=4,34
• Konrady v. U.S. Airways, Inc., 165 N.C. App. 620, 599 S.E.2d 593 (2004). https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=12245078414243120053&q=konrady+v+us+airways+inc&hl=en&as_sdt=4,34
• Queen v. Penske Corp., 174 N.C. App. 814, 625 S.E.2d 121 (2005), petition for discretionary review denied, 360 N.C. 648, 636 S.E.2d 810 (2006). https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=14469260045263317699&q=queen+v+penske+corporation&hl=en&as_sdt=4,34 and https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=3200244852862083866&q=queen+v+penske+corporation&hl=en&as_sdt=4,34
• Brooks v. Capstar Corp., 360 N.C. 60, 621 S.E.2d 170 (2005) (wrote amicus curiae brief for the North Carolina Academy of Trial Lawyers). https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=4470956164717449168&q=brooks+v+capstar+corp&hl=en&as_sdt=4,34
• Montgomery v. Toastmaster, Inc., 174 N.C. App. 320, 620 S.E.2d 685 (2005). https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=5239382095902819078&q=montgomery+v+toastmaster+inc&hl=en&as_sdt=4,34
• Driggers v. Central Church of God, COA 05-1142 (dismissed Nov. 17, 2005) (defendants’ appeal voluntarily withdrawn and dismissed before Record on Appeal filed).
• Bowling v. US Airways Group, Inc., COA P06-55 (2006) (settled after defendants’ Notice of Appeal filed with Industrial Commission, but before Record on Appeal filed).
• Silvers v. Mastercraft, Inc., 2006 N.C. App. LEXIS 1162 (filed June 6, 2006). https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=4613079252769609270&q=silvers+v+mastercraft+fabrics+llc&hl=en&as_sdt=4,34
• Dodrill v. Jerry Rhyne’s Collision Repair, COA 05-1408, 2006 N.C. App. LEXIS 1472 (filed July 5, 2006). https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=12466811500417649873&q=dodrill+v+jerry+collision+repair&hl=en&as_sdt=4,34
• Gainer v. Graebel Van Lines, COA 06-1475 (dismissed Dec. 5, 2006) (case settled and defendants voluntarily withdrew appeal after record filed, but before briefs filed).
• D’Aquisto v. Mission St. Joseph’s Health Systems, 360 N.C. 567, 633 S.E.2d 89 (2006), appeal after remand, 198 N.C. App. 674, 680 S.E.2d 249 (2009). https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=8666638670147676403&q=d%27aquisto+v.+mission&hl=en&as_sdt=4,34 and https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=14043980336857484200&q=d%27aquisto+v.+mission&hl=en&as_sdt=4,34
• Shaw v. U.S. Airways, Inc., 362 N.C. 457, 665 S.E.2d 449 (2008), reversing, 186 N.C. App. 474, 652 S.E.2d 22 (2007), appeal after remand on unrelated proceedings, 217 N.C. App. 539, 720 S.E.2d 688 (2011). https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=1329007965919842257&q=shaw+v.+u.s.+airways&hl=en&as_sdt=4,34 and https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=1329007965919842257&q=shaw+v.+u.s.+airways&hl=en&as_sdt=4,34 and https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=10308115345945560610&q=shaw+v.+u.s.+airways&hl=en&as_sdt=4,34
• Polston v. Six Star Economic Development/Golden Corral, COA 06-1500, 2007 N.C. App. LEXIS 1901 (filed Sept. 4, 2007). https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=66184494793873618&q=polston+v+six+star+economic+development+golden+corral&hl=en&as_sdt=4,34
• McCarver v. Hunter Motors, Inc., COA 07-346, 2008 N.C. App. LEXIS 53 (filed Jan. 15, 2008). https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=1020585977457307337&q=mccarver+v+hunter+motors+inc&hl=en&as_sdt=4,34
• Roberts v. Dixie News, Inc., 189 N.C. App. 495, 658 S.E.2d 684 (2008). https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=9591370652054986587&q=roberts+v+dixie+news+inc&hl=en&as_sdt=4,34
• Davis v. Harrah’s Cherokee Casino, 362 N.C. 133, 655 S.E.2d 392 (2008) (wrote amicus curiae brief for the North Carolina Academy of Trial Lawyers). https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=10162564840096087316&q=davis+v.+harrah%27s&hl=en&as_sdt=4,34
• Starr v. Gaston County Board of Educ., 191 N.C. App. 301, 663 S.E.2d 322 (2008). https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=12372823167077904743&q=starr+v+gaston+county+bd+of+educ&hl=en&as_sdt=4,34
• Meares v. Dana Corp., 172 N.C. App. 291, 615 S.E.2d 912 (2005), subsequent appeal after remand, 193 N.C. App. 86, 666 S.E.2d 819 (2008), petition for discretionary review denied, 363 N.C. 129, 673 S.E.2d 359 (2009). https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=4223453162344031589&q=meares+v+dana+corp+wix+div&hl=en&as_sdt=4,34 and https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=8814491463786544674&q=meares+v+dana+corp&hl=en&as_sdt=4,34
• Gesel v. Miller Orthopaedic Clinic, 2009 N.C. App. LEXIS 1122, 680 S.E.2d 903 (filed July 7, 2009), petition for discretionary review denied, 363 N.C. 801, 690 S.E.2d 535 (2010). https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=702899050471190887&q=gesel+v+miller+orthopaedic+clinic+inc&hl=en&as_sdt=4,34 and https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=7596019353549820873&q=gesel+v+miller+orthopaedic+clinic+inc&hl=en&as_sdt=4,34
• Nale v. Ethan Allen, 199 N.C. App. 511, 682 S.E.2d 231 (2009), petition for discretionary review denied, 363 N.C. 745, 688 S.E.2d 454 (2009). https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=1102776265917101114&q=nale+v+ethan+allen&hl=en&as_sdt=4,34
• Hatley v. Continental Gen’l Tire, 203 N.C. App. 372, 692 S.E.2d 488 (2010), appeal after remand, 215 N. C. App. 389, 716 S.E.2d 89, 2011 N.C. App. LEXIS 2005 (2011), reporting 2011 N.C. App. 1927 (filed Sept. 6, 2011) (unpublished opinion). https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=11994126738864750368&q=hatley+v+continental+general+tire&hl=en&as_sdt=4,34 and https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=4191259797947993661&q=hatley+v+continental+general+tire&hl=en&as_sdt=4,34
• Thompson v. Aramark, Inc., 2010 N.C. App. LEXIS 2004*, 207 N.C. App. 526, 700 S.E.2d 249 (2010) (unpublished opinion). https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=12947450522542383871&q=thompson+v.+aramark+&hl=en&as_sdt=4,34 and https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=8046732318651812139&q=thompson+v.+aramark+&hl=en&as_sdt=4,34
• Thomas v. Contract Core Drilling & Sawing, 209 N.C. App. 198, 703 S.E.2d 862 (2011). https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=17590902795897848659&q=thomas+v+contract+core+drilling+%26+sawing&hl=en&as_sdt=4,34
• Kee v. Caromont Health, Inc., 209 N.C. App. 193, 706 S.E.2d 781 (2011), overruled by legislative amendment, “An Act Protecting and Putting North Carolina Back to Work by Reforming the Workers’ Compensation Act, 2011 N.C. Sess. Law 287 (H.B. 709) § 4. https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=4103964458024760172&q=kee+v+caromont+health+inc&hl=en&as_sdt=4,34 and https://www.ncleg.gov/Sessions/2011/Bills/House/PDF/H709v4.pdf
• Ashley v. C&H Carriers, COA 10-1370 (case settled after Record on Appeal filed, but before any briefs filed).
• Cardwell v. Jenkins Cleaners, Inc., 365 N.C. 1, 704 S.E.2d 898 (2011) (wrote amicus curiae brief for the North Carolina Advocates for Justice). https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=6284022528003992088&q=cardwell+v+jenkins+cleaners+inc&hl=en&as_sdt=4,34
• Yous v. Greif, Inc., 210 N.C. App. 492, 711 S.E.2d 207, 2011 N.C. App. LEXIS 517 (2011) (unpublished opinion). https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=6045867058150484890&q=yous+v+grief+inc&hl=en&as_sdt=4,34 and https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=5210791679748554735&q=yous+v+grief+inc&hl=en&as_sdt=4,34
• Mehaffey v. Burger King, 217 N.C. App. 318, 718 S.E.2d 720 (2011), reversed, 367 N.C. 120, 749 S.E.2d 252 (2012). https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=14982582032083448862&q=mehaffey+v+burger+king&hl=en&as_sdt=4,34 and https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=6554312545443544363&q=mehaffey+v+burger+king&hl=en&as_sdt=4,34
• Cawthorn v. Mission Hosp., Inc., 211 N.C. App.42, 712 S.E.2d 306 (2011). https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=4879096518720728109&q=cawthorn+v+mission+hosp+inc&hl=en&as_sdt=4,34
• Tinsley v. City of Charlotte, COA 11-1117 (2011) (remanded by order to Full Commission), appeal after further proceedings, 228 N.C. App. 744, 747 S.E.2d 145 (2013). https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=14937137808469208951&q=Tinsley+v.+city+of+charlotte&hl=en&as_sdt=4,34
• Helfrich v. Coca-Cola Bottling Co. Consolidated, 225 N.C. App. 701, 741 S.E.2d 408 (2013). https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=18088013909097165220&q=helfrich+v+coca+cola+bottling+co+consol&hl=en&as_sdt=4,34
• Grayson v. First Charlotte Perfusion Services & Novant Health, 223 N.C. App. 361, 734 S.E.2d 139, 2012 N.C. App. LEXIS 1226 (2012). https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=9604903760808306348&q=grayson+v+first+charlotte+perfusion+services+inc&hl=en&as_sdt=4,34 and https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=14958781431166620522&q=grayson+v+first+charlotte+perfusion+services+inc&hl=en&as_sdt=4,34
• Smith v. Aramark, COA 12-454 (N.C. App. 2012) (settled after Defendant’s Notice of Appeal filed, but before Record on Appeal filed with Court of Appeals, and appeal withdrawn as ordered on October 10, 2012).
• Anglin v. Dunbar Armored, 226 N.C. App. 203, 742 S.E.2d 205 (2013). https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=15363838176894038708&q=anglin+v+dunbar+armored+inc&hl=en&as_sdt=4,34
• Gonzalez v. Worrell, 366 N.C. 501, 739 S.E.2d 552 (2013) (co-wrote amicus curiae brief for the North Carolina Advocates for Justice). https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=962254635391269560&q=gonzalez+v+worrell&hl=en&as_sdt=4,34
• Sinanovic v. W.B. Moore Co., IC No. 028831 (2013) (settled after Notice of Appeal filed, but before Record on Appeal filed).
• Bethea v. U.S. Airways, Inc., 231 N.C. App. 713, 754 S.E.2d 258, 2014 N.C. App. LEXIS 48 (2014). https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=6912172444463204926&q=Bethea+v.+u.s.+airways&hl=en&as_sdt=4,34 and https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=13487731785088916309&q=Bethea+v.+u.s.+airways&hl=en&as_sdt=4,34
• Miller v. Carolinas Medical Center-Northeast, 233 N.C. App. 342, 756 S.E.2d 54 (2014). https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=9305930013582193869&q=miller+v.+northeast+medical&hl=en&as_sdt=4,34
• Burley v. US Foods, Inc., 233 N.C. App. 286, 756 S.E.2d 84 (2014), rev’d, 368 N.C. 315, 776 S.E.2d 832 (2015). https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=5229461754128975456&q=burley+v.+United+States+foods&hl=en&as_sdt=4,34 and https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=7129410539170216764&q=burley+v.+United+States+foods&hl=en&as_sdt=4,34
• Skoff v. U.S. Airways, Inc., 234 N.C. App. 329, 762 S.E.2d 2, 2014 N.C. App. LEXIS 588 (2014) (unpublished opinion), petition for discretionary review denied, 367 N.C. 810, 767 S.E.2d 524 (2015) (filed Jan. 23, 2015). https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=2633329899998401187&q=skoff+v.+u.s.+airways&hl=en&as_sdt=4,34 and https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=11751544733280358965&q=skoff+v.+u.s.+airways&hl=en&as_sdt=4,34 and https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=12570440569028135598&q=skoff+v.+u.s.+airways&hl=en&as_sdt=4,34
• Winston v. Charlotte Observer, IC No. X69037 (appeal withdrawn after defendants’ Notice of Appeal filed on Sept. 13, 2013).
• Medlin v. Weaver Cooke Constr., LLC, 367 N.C. 414, 760 S.E.2d 732 (2014) (wrote amicus curiae brief for the North Carolina Advocates for Justice). https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=17977624890917029327&q=medlin+v+weaver+cooke+const+llc&hl=en&as_sdt=4,34
• Ademovic v. Taxi USA, LLC, 237 N.C. App. 402, 767 S.E.2d 571 (2014). https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=5097181003122398003&q=ademovic+v+taxi+usa+llc&hl=en&as_sdt=4,34
• Gregory v. Pearson, 367 N.C. 315, 754 S.E.2d 416 (2014) (3-3 split) (co-wrote amicus curiae brief for the North Carolina Advocates for Justice), affirming per curiam without precedential value, 224 N.C. App. 580, 736 S.E.2d 577 (2012). https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=3003071260545766217&q=Gregory+v.+pearson&hl=en&as_sdt=4,34
• Haileab v. John Q. Hammons Hotels, Inc., 240 N.C. App. 293, 772 S.E.2d 265, 2015 N.C. App. LEXIS 286 (2015) (unpublished). https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=3572856771821667719&q=haileab+v+john+q+hammons+hotels&hl=en&as_sdt=4,34 and https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=8471766203369224174&q=haileab+v+john+q+hammons+hotels&hl=en&as_sdt=4,34
• Wells v. Charlotte Mecklenburg Hosp. Auth., 238 N.C. App. 364, 768 S.E.2d 201, 2014 N.C. App. LEXIS 1371 (2014) (unpublished). https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=1464579564515406697&q=wells+v+charlotte+mecklenburg+hospital+authority&hl=en&as_sdt=4,34 and https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=486968134336141371&q=wells+v+charlotte+mecklenburg+hospital+authority&hl=en&as_sdt=4,34
• Heglar v. Commissioners of the N.C. Indus. Comm’n, P14-329 (order filed June 11, 2014) (petition for writ of mandamus).
• Edwards v. Reddy Ice, 247 N.C. App. 245, 2016 N.C. App. LEXIS 397 (2016) (unpublished). https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=7165367806933031901&q=edwards+v+reddy+ice&hl=en&as_sdt=4,34
• Alfredson v. Premier Transportation. Co. (case settled after Notice of Appeal filed on January 30, 2015).
• Breath v. OrthoCarolina, 244 N.C. App. 776, 781 S.E.2d 532, 2016 N.C. App. LEXIS 34 (2016) (unpublished). https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=14354131808194929756&q=breath+v+orthocarolina&hl=en&as_sdt=4,34 and https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=2297921929805094345&q=breath+v+orthocarolina&hl=en&as_sdt=4,34
• Farley v. Sygma Network, Inc., IC No. 13-756437 (case settled after Notice of Appeal filed on June 12, 2015).
• Rainey v. City of Charlotte, 247 N.C. 594, 785 S.E.2d 766, 2016 N.C. App. LEXIS 565 (2015), petition for discretionary review denied, 793 S.E.2d 231, 2016 N.C. LEXIS 860 (2016). https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=8238402228297984729&q=rainey+v.+city+of+Charlotte&hl=en&as_sdt=4,34 and https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=12029644541571522097&q=rainey+v.+city+of+Charlotte&hl=en&as_sdt=4,34
• Saunders v. ADP Total Source FI XI, Inc., 249 N.C. App. 361, 791 S.E.2d 466, 2016 N.C. App. LEXIS 927 (2016), petition for discretionary review allowed in part, 2017 N.C. LEXIS 826, 370 N.C. 271, 805 S.E.2d 486 (2017), reversed, 372 N.C. 29, 822 S.E.2d 857 (2019). https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=4786544764725787665&q=saunders+v+adp+totalsource+fi+xi+inc&hl=en&as_sdt=4,34 and https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=5317569545272190350&q=saunders+v+adp+totalsource+fi+xi+inc&hl=en&as_sdt=4,34 and https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=7661863317572627301&q=saunders+v+adp+totalsource+fi+xi+inc&hl=en&as_sdt=4,34
• Lewis v. Transit Management of Charlotte, 250 N.C. App. 619, 792 S.E.2d 890, 2016 N.C. App. LEXIS 1241 (2016), case settled before petitions for discretionary review and responses to petitions for discretionary review for both sides decided, (dismissed on June 12, 2017). https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=17185575692750508700&q=lewis+v+transit+management+of+charlotte&hl=en&as_sdt=4,34 and https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=17265392772154407928&q=lewis+v+transit+management+of+charlotte&hl=en&as_sdt=4,34
• Wilkes v. City of Greenville, 369 N.C. 730, 787 S.E.2d 16 (2016) (co-wrote amicus curiae brief for the North Carolina Advocates for Justice). https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=2578167794600122718&q=Wilkes+v.+city+of+greenville&hl=en&as_sdt=4,34
• Easter-Rozzelle v. City of Charlotte, 370 N.C. 286, 807 S.E.2d 122 (2017). https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=4737767893284286603&q=easter+rozzelle+v+city+of+charlotte&hl=en&as_sdt=4,34
• McCleod v. Spectrum Brands, IC File No. 13-748970 (defendants’ Notice of Appeal to Court of Appeals filed on May 18, 2017, and withdrawn after case settled on June 30, 2017).
• Pine v. Wal-Mart Assocs., Inc. #1552, 371 N.C. 707, 821 S.E.2d 155 (2018) (wrote amicus curiae brief for the North Carolina Advocates for Justice). https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=17279962013541076621&q=pine+v+wal+mart+associates+inc&hl=en&as_sdt=4,34
• Walker v. K&W Cafeterias, 264 N.C. App. 119, 824 S.E.2d 894 (2019), reversed, 375 N.C. 254, 846 S.E.2d 679 (2020), appeal after remand, 2022-NCCOA-219, 282 N.C. App. 708, 872 S.E.2d 68 (2022), petition for discretionary review denied, 383 N.C. 680, 880 S.E.2d 695 (2022). https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=10012718786987707513&q=walker+v.+k%26w&hl=en&as_sdt=4,34 and https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=5578030815722557728&q=walker+v.+k%26w&hl=en&as_sdt=4,34 and https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=13698437665337667111&q=walker+v.+k%26w&hl=en&as_sdt=4,34 and https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=3346803302693714687&q=walker+v.+k%26w&hl=en&as_sdt=4,34
• Watkins v. Federal Express, IC File No. X98323 (Plaintiff’s Notice of Appeal filed on Nov. 21, 2018, Plaintiff-Appellant’s Brief filed on Feb. 14, 2019, resolved through Consent Order on July 22, 2019, and order dismissing appeal filed on Aug. 7, 2019).
• Lake et al. v. State Health Plan for Teachers & State Employees et al, 2022-NCSC-22, 380 N.C. 502, 869 S.E.2d 292 (2022) (amicus brief for American Association of Retired Persons (AARP) and AARP Foundation). https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=16409231818930128234&q=lake+v+state+health+plan+for+teachers&hl=en&as_sdt=4,34
• Cunningham v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co., 2022-NCSC-46, 381 N.C. 10, 871 S.E.2d 724 (2022) (amicus brief for North Carolina Advocates for Justice). https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=6457915683698020550&q=cunningham+v+goodyear+tire+%26+rubber+co&hl=en&as_sdt=4,34
• Keith v. Health Pro Home Care Services., Inc., 2022-NCSC-72, 381 N.C. 442, 873 S.E.2d 567 (2022) (amicus brief for North Carolina Advocates for Justice). https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=10989216092280130470&q=keith+v+health+pro+home+care+services&hl=en&as_sdt=4,34
• Monroe v. MV Transp., 2022-NCCOA-30, 281 N.C. App. 363, 869 S.E.2d 28 (2022). https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=17169228152231663875&q=monroe+v.+mv+transport&hl=en&as_sdt=4,34
• Jenkins v. Wells Fargo Bank, 2022-NCCOA-70, 281 N.C. App. 627, 867 S.E.2d 424 (2002) (unpublished), petition for discretionary review denied, 381 N.C. 709, 873 S.E.2d 12 (2022). https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=9461434372247549904&q=jenkins+v+wells+fargo&hl=en&as_sdt=4,34 and https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=6617954247451889783&q=jenkins+v+wells+fargo&hl=en&as_sdt=4,34
• Sardis Presbyterian Church, Charlotte, North Carolina, Presbyterian Church (U.S.A.), Inc. v. MidAmerica Productions, Inc., Midam International, Inc., and Peter Tiboris, (Mecklenburg County Superior Court Case No. 20-CVS-8293, case settled after Notice of Appeal filed on Sept. 20, 2021).
• Peacock v. Panthers Football, LLC and Devin Akeem Funchess, COA No. 22-98 (case settled just before North Carolina Court of Appeals hearing on Sept. 21, 2022).
• Betts v. North Carolina Dept. of Health & Human Servs., 2023 N.C. App. LEXIS 379*, 888 S.E.2d 414, 2023 WL 4346794 (N.C. App. filed July 5, 2023) (unpublished), opinion vacated and remanded to the Court of Appeals for reconsideration in light of the Supreme Court’s opinion in Sturdivant v. North Carolina Department of Public Safety, 130PA23 (filed Dec. 13, 2024) . https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=17418369638610427137&q=betts+v+north+carolina+department+of+health+and+human+services&hl=en&as_sdt=4,34 and https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=5164816052719753474&q=betts+v+north+carolina+department+of+health+and+human+services&hl=en&as_sdt=4,34 and
• Monsam v. Premium Motorsports, IC No. 15-740065 (case settled after Defendants’ Notice of Appeal filed on March 25, 2022).
• D&B Marine, LLC v. AIG Property Casualty Co., 288 N.C. App. 106, 885 S.E.2d 842 (2023), petition for discretionary review denied, 385 N.C. 392, 892 S.E.2d 605 (2023). https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=1539320040205989256&q=d%26b+marine&hl=en&as_sdt=4,34 and https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=5126643780016297932&q=d%26b+marine&hl=en&as_sdt=4,34
• Carra Jane Penegar, Executrix of the Estate of Johnny Ray Penegar, Jr., individually and on behalf of others similarly situated v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Co., Liberty Mutual Fire Ins. Co., Verisk Analytics, Inc., and ISO Partners, Inc., No. 22-1940 (U.S. Circuit Court for the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals) (oral argument on Dec. 5, 2023).
• West v. Hoyle’s Tire & Axle, LLC, 383 N.C. 654, 881 S.E.2d 149 (2022). https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=8122270522781570219&q=west+v.+hoyle&hl=en&as_sdt=4,34
• Porter v. Alliance Credit Counseling, Inc., 2023 N.C. App. LEXIS 819 (filed Dec. 19, 2023). https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=5688278205982902746&q=porter+v.+alliance&hl=en&as_sdt=4,34 and https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=17783681949046286238&q=porter+v.+alliance&hl=en&as_sdt=4,34
• Thompson v. Cranfill, Sumner & Hartzog, COA No. 24-596 (appeal to Superior Court under N.C. Gen. Stat. § 97-90(c) filed on Nov. 23, 2023, and resolved by IC order on Jan. 11, 2024), and notices of appeal under N.C. Gen. Stat. § 97-86 filed by Plaintiff on Feb. 28, 2024, and by Defendants on Feb. 29, 2024).
• Martinez-Estrada v. Century Slate Co., COA 24-668 (appeal to Superior Court under N.C. Gen. Stat. § 97-90(c) filed on Feb. 29, 2024, and resolved by IC order on March 11, 2024), and notices of appeal to Court of Appeals under N.C. Gen. Stat. § 97-86 filed by Defendants on March 21, 2024, and by Plaintiff on March 22, 2024) (global settlement of case approved in October 2024 during pendency of appeal).